Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Detonation and deflagration waves are compared and distinguished for hydrogen/air mixtures. Chemical explosive mode analysis (CEMA) showed that detonation is characterized by higher chemical explosive mode eigenvalues and undergoes radical explosion after the shock wave. CEMA showed that the H radical makes the largest contribution to the chemical explosive mode and can be used as an ignition indicator. A characteristic Damköhler number (Dac,H) is then defined as the ratio of the H radical peak chemical production to peak diffusion rates. The deflagration mode consistently shows a Dac,H of O(1) at a wide range of operating conditions, while detonation shows a higher contribution of chemistry relative to diffusion that increases with pressure [i.e. O(100) for P = 1 bar and O(1000) for P = 10 bar]. This behavior is due to the different ignition and flame propagation mechanisms for detonation compared to deflagration. The criterion is applied to one-dimensional detonation and deflagration propagating flames and to the non-premixed Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)'s 6-inch Rotating detonation engine over a wide range of pressures and equivalence ratios. Analysis shows that the criterion can detect successfully the detonation front and contact burning by deflagration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elasrag et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: