Forty-two cultures, representing 22 genera of bacteria, were tested for 123 properties. The data obtained were coded and subjected to Adansonian analysis by electronic computer. At 80% or greater similarity levels, six distinct groups were present: group 1, which contained the enterobacteria and Aeromonas; group 2 contained Pseudomonas, Vibrio cuneatus, Achromobacter, and Acinetobacter; group 3 contained Agrobacterium; group 4, the largest cluster, had two subgroups, 4a, containing the Gram-positive cocci, Nocardia, Mycobacterium, and Arthrobacter spp., and 4b, containing the streptomycetes; group 5 contained Cytophaga and group 6, containing Bacillus spp., Bacillus pantothenticus, and Protaminobacter alboflavus, did not share a high phenetic similarity with any of the above cultures and the clusters were regarded as isolated and single-item. The results confirmed earlier indications that the evaluation of taxonomic relationships by numerical methods can indicate areas in need of closer examination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Goodfellow (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: