Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We designed and evaluated an ambulatory care intervention aimed at improving glycemic control and reducing hospitalizations in patients with insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). One hundred seventy-one youth with IDDM, ages 10–15, were assigned either to a Care Ambassador intervention (N = 89) or to standard care (N = 82). The intervention consisted of scheduling, confirming, and documenting medical follow-up for 24 months. During the study, the intervention group had more diabetes visits, 7.1 ± 1.50 (mean ± SD)Vs. 5.2 ± 2.57 in the standard care group (P = 0.0001). In the at-risk subjects (baseline HbA1c ≥8.1%, N = 162), 50% of intervention subjects compared with 29% of standard care achieved HbAlc ≤8.6% while 17% of intervention subjects compared with 32% of standard care had values >9.6% (P = 0.039). During follow-up, severe hypoglycemia and hospitalization/ER use occurred at half the rate in the intervention group compared with standard care. This specific, low-cost intervention aimed at increasing ambulatory medical visits in at-risk patients with diabetes improves metabolic outcomes and significantly reduces hospital/ER use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laffel et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: