Key result
Shenfu injection significantly improved the overall clinical response rate compared to conventional medication alone in patients with bradyarrhythmia (RR 1.29).
Why the study?
Bradyarrhythmia is common in clinical settings, and this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Shenfu injection in its treatment.
Does Shenfu injection improve clinical symptoms and heart rate in patients with bradyarrhythmia?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,143)
Does Shenfu injection improve clinical symptoms and heart rate in patients with bradyarrhythmia?
Shenfu injection significantly improves the overall clinical response rate and heart rate in patients with bradyarrhythmia compared to conventional basic therapy, with a lower incidence of adverse events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adjunctive Shenfu injection for bradyarrhythmia; confirms pooled efficacy in Level 1 evidence.
BACKGROUND: Bradyarrhythmia is a form of arrhythmia commonly seen in clinical settings. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of the Shenfu injection (SFI) in the treatment of bradyarrhythmia. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in seven databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to SFI and the treatment of bradyarrhythmia. Primary outcome in this meta-analysis included the overall response rate in clinical symptom improvement. The risk of bias was evaluated utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies, involving 2143 patients with bradyarrhythmia, were included. The meta-analysis results suggest that SFI treatment is superior to conventional medication alone. Further sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the total response rate in the SFI group was significantly higher than that in the conventional medication group (RR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.22-1.37; P < .00001). Moreover, the improvement in heart rate in the SFI group was significantly better than that in the conventional medication group (MD = 5.17; 95% CI: 3.77-6.58; P < .00001). In terms of safety, the incidence of adverse events was lower in the SFI treatment group (5.25%, 19/362) compared to the conventional medication alone group (34.04%, 113/332) (RR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.51; P < .001). CONCLUSION: SFI demonstrates significant improvement in the overall response rate and safety for patients with bradyarrhythmia compared to conventional basic therapy. However, due to the presence of potential bias in the included studies, well-designed RCT trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of adjuvant SFI therapy for the treatment of bradyarrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in bradyarrhythmia (n=2,143). Shenfu injection vs. conventional therapy was evaluated on overall response rate in clinical symptom improvement (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.37, p=<0.00001). Shenfu injection significantly improved the overall clinical response rate compared to conventional medication alone in patients with bradyarrhythmia (RR 1.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: