BACKGROUND No specific description of monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS)-associated angioedema due to acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) has been reported yet. OBJECTIVE Describe the biological and clinical characteristics, evolution and response to treatment of MGUS-associated AAE-C1-INH. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a French national retrospective observational study on MGUS-associated acquired angioedema spanning a 30-year period. RESULTS Forty-one patients with MGUS-associated AAE-C1-INH at diagnosis were included; 68% displayed anti-C1INH antibodies. The monoclonal component was an IgM in 24 patients, IgG in 11 and IgA in 6 patients. Mean age at first angioedema attack was 63 years (SD = 13) and at diagnosis 66 years (SD = 11). 88 % of patients benefited from acute attack treatments, and 77% from long-term prophylaxis, either danazol, tranexamic acid or lanadelumab. Median follow-up was 7 years, during which 14 patients (33%) evolved into well-defined malignant hemopathies. 50 % of patients were given a hematological treatment, either rituximab alone, indicated by recurrent attacks of angioedema in patients with AAE-C1-INH with anti-C1-INH antibodies, or validated combinations of chemotherapies, indicated by evolution into a lymphoma in 7 patients and a myeloma in 3 patients. Fifteen patients (35%) were in clinical complete remission of angioedema at last visit, of which 60% had an undetectable serum monoclonal immunoglobulin. CONCLUSION Complete remission of AAE-C1-INH is correlated to complete remission of the underlying hematological malignancy, as defined by an undetectable serum monoclonal immunoglobulin. In our MGUS-associated acquired angioedema cohort, we recorded an incidence of evolution into hematological malignancy of 4% per patient-year. It is therefore crucial to conduct full hematological workup during follow-up at an annual rate, and earlier if AAE relapses or if acute attacks frequency increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lahuna et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: