Key result
Rhythm control and rate control therapies have comparable effects on mortality and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, though better data are needed.
Why the study?
Does rhythm control therapy improve mortality and stroke compared to rate control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review
Does rhythm control therapy improve mortality and stroke compared to rate control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Rate and rhythm control strategies have comparable effects on mortality and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, though better data are needed.
Commentary on : Al-Khatib SM, Allen LaPointe NM, Chatterjee R, et al. Rate- and rhythm-control therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:760–73.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a large and growing burden on cardiovascular healthcare and leads to a substantial impact on quality-of-life, increased cardiovascular events and a doubling of hospitalisation and death rates.1 Unlike many other cardiac conditions, the evidence base for treatment in AF remains patchy with clear gaps relating to a number of clinically important management strategies. Current practice involves three major elements: anticoagulation to prevent stroke or systemic embolism, medications to control heart rate and a decision on whether to restore and maintain sinus rhythm. This systematic review and meta-analysis of tabular data addresses the benefits and risks of adding rhythm control to rate control therapy, considers the preferential method … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DAnn%2BIntern%2BMed%26rft.volume%253D160%26rft.spage%253D760%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.7326%252FM13-1467%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F24887617%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/M13-1467&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=24887617&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F19%2F6%2F222.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000337348700003&link_type=ISI
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotecha et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation. Rhythm control vs. Rate control was evaluated on Mortality and stroke. Rhythm control and rate control therapies have comparable effects on mortality and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, though better data are needed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: