Why the study?
Does bidirectional transvenous shock (dual current pathways) reduce the energy required for successful cardioversion compared to unidirectional shock in patients with rapid ventricular tachycardia?
Does bidirectional transvenous shock (dual current pathways) reduce the energy required for successful cardioversion compared to unidirectional shock in patients with rapid ventricular tachycardia?
Dual current pathways (bidirectional shocks) significantly decrease the energy required for successful transvenous cardioversion of rapid ventricular tachycardia compared to single current pathways.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bidirectional shocks reduce energy for rapid VT cardioversion; extends RCT evidence for dual over single current pathways.
By using a prospective randomized study design, we compared the clinical efficacy and safety of single unidirectional and bidirectional transvenous cardioversion shocks for termination of rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT) having cycle lengths less than 300 ms. A Medtronic 6880 catheter was placed in the right ventricular apex and an R2 skin patch electrode was placed over the left scapula. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A patients received unidirectional transvenous shocks using the two catheter electrodes (right ventricular apical cathode and superior vena caval anode) which resulted in a single current pathway. Group B patients received bidirectional transvenous shocks using a common cathode (right ventricular apex) and two separate anodes (superior vena caval and R2 patch) resulting in two current pathways. Identical shocks with total energies of 2.7, 5.0 and 10.0 J and waveform tilt of 27% were delivered to Groups A and B. In selected Group B patients, delivered shock currents through the right ventricular apex/superior vena caval and right ventricular apex/R2 patch electrode pairs were measured. We analyzed the initial episode of VT with a cycle length less than 300 ms in 33 patients with organic heart disease (mean age, 64 +/- 9 years; mean VT cycle length, 248 +/- 37 ms) who underwent programmed electrical stimulation. Transvenous cardioversion shocks terminated 31% of 16 VT episodes in Group A and 41% of 17 VT episodes in Group B (p greater than .2). The mean successful shock energy was 6.1 +/- 3.7 J in Group A and 3.0 +/- 0.9 J in Group B (p less than .05). Forty percent of all successfully cardioverted episodes in Group A and 86% of all successfully cardioverted VT episodes in Group B were terminated at an energy of 2.7 J (p = .09). Analysis of shock waveforms in Group B revealed 47 to 74% of the total current was transmitted through the right ventricular apex/superior vena caval electrodes and 26 to 53% through the right ventricular apex/R2 electrodes. We conclude that single bidirectional transvenous shocks are effective for rapid VT termination in selected patients. Dual current pathways decrease energies needed for successful transvenous cardioversion in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saksena et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: