The formation of ArSY (Y: C(= S)NMe2, Ph, P(= O)(OEt)2) by reductive elimination from σ‐aryl complexes (M(PPh3)2PhBr, M = Ni, Pd), associated with disulfides (YS−SY, Y: C(=S)NMe2 (1), Ph (2), P(=O)(OEt)2 (3)), at ambient temperature, has been investigated. Various mechanistic features of disulfide bond (S−S) cleavage have been elucidated using disulfide 1 by 31P NMR spectroscopy and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight mass spectrometric investigations. Based upon the results of nucleophilic cleavage of the S−S bond by PPh3, studies of the reductive elimination process show that when M(PPh3)2PhBr is mixed with disulfide 1, competitive reactions occur between the PPh3 ligand, disulfide 1 and a trace amount of water, leading to low C−S coupling yields; an oxidation reaction of PPh3 with disulfide and water occur prior to C−S cross‐coupling, and phosphonium ion intermediates are likely involved. However, when the disulfide 1 is pretreated with PPh3, the Ni(II) σ‐aryl complex affords the C−S coupling product nearly quantitatively at room temperature. The pretreatment method is also effective for the coupling reaction of disulfide 2 and Ni(II) σ‐aryl complex. The difference between Ni(II) and Pd(II) σ‐aryl complexes on C−S bond formation by reductive elimination can be explained by the affinity of metal for the thiolate ligands derived from the cleaved disulfide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okamoto et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: