This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Vibrational spectroscopic study of crystalline copper hexacyanoferrate complexes of composition K4CuII6 [FeII(CN)6]4·nH2O (1) and CuII6[FeIII(CN)6]4·nH2O (2) with -Cu-N≡C-Fe- bridging structures have been performed. The cubic Fm3¯m (Oh5) unit-cells contain ideally 4 Fe and 4 Cu ions which were calculated by periodic density functional theory (DFT) (using the Gaussian09 C.01 software package) for ideal lattice compositions of K8CuII4[FeII(CN)6]4 (1a), K4CuII4[FeIII(CN)6]4 (2a) and with lattice water molecules KCuII4[FeIII(CN)6]3·6H2O (3a). Systematically, non-linear Cu-N≡C structure was fitted with Cu-N≡C bond angles about 155° for complexes 1a, 2a, and 3a. Practically, all optically active internal modes of Fe(CN6)n− moieties resulted from factor group analysis as 4A1g + 6Eg + 4F1g + 10F1u were experimentally observed and assigned. Some low-frequency translatory and librational modes were also interpreted. Vibrational bands were assigned to cis- and trans-Cu(NC)4(OH2) complexes which are formed in the lattice holes of both complexes. Vibrational spectra and force constants of a great number of transition metal hexacyano complexes of compositions K4[MII(CN)6], K3[MIII(CN)6], CsLi2[MIII(CN)6] and Prussian blue analogues have been reexamined and recalculated. Internal and external modes of 6 different lattice water species (coordinated, hydrogen bonded, or zeolitic type) have been interpreted for complex 2 using results of periodic DFT calculation of model complex 3a.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mink et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: