Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The 103Rh NMR chemical shifts for hexa(cyano-κC)-, hexa(thiocyanato-κS)-rhodate(III) and tris(O,O′-diethyl dithiophosphato-κ2S,S′)rhodium(III) have been determined in aqueous solution. Two-bond spin–spin coupling is observed between 103Rh and 31P in the 103Rh NMR spectrum of [Rh{S2P(OEt)2}3], 2J(Rh–P)= 13 Hz. A value for the nephelauxetic ratio (β= 0.29 ± 0.05) was obtained for the [Rh(SCN)6]3– ion from a correlation between the 103Rh NMR chemical shifts of octahedral rhodium(III) complexes and the ligand-field parameter ratio, β/ΔE(1A1g–1T1g). Comparison with the nephelauxetic ratios of other S- and N-bonded complexes shows S-bonding between rhodium(III) and the thiocyanate ligand. An empirical correlation is demonstrated between the metal NMR chemical shift and the logarithm of the overall thermodynamic formation constant (log β6), for a range of octahedral rhodium(III) and cobalt(III) complexes, thus allowing the formation constants log β6= 47 ± 4 and 35 ± 3 to be estimated for [Rh(CN)6]3– and [Rh(SCN)6]3–, respectively. The stability of the aquafluororhodium(III) species is discussed. The thermodynamic basis for the dissolution of rhodium metal in aqueous solution using cyanide or thiocyanate is examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Read et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: