A study was conducted to determine the feasibility of cathodically protecting the steel surface beneath a disbonded coating with a holiday using an external power source. A laboratory cell was used to simulate the field condition of a steel pipe buried in a soil saturated with ground water that had resistivity of 3,050 Ω-cm to 4,400 Ω-cm. The local pipe potential and solution pH within the crevice of the disbonded coating during cathodic protection were measured over time. The relative advantages of using a pulsed current (PC) vs those of a direct current (DC) were examined. Results indicated applied cell voltage was an important factor for proper protection of a coated steel pipe in high-resistivity soils. A low cell voltage would not permit sufficient polarization of the steel surface within the crevice. A high voltage induced excessive hydrogen evolution at the crevice opening, which blocked penetration of cathodic current into the crevice. The optimal cell voltage was: (a) PC of a frequency of 1 Hz and a duty cycle 0.5 at a controlled voltage setting (Von) = 15 V to 20 V and (b) DC at Von = 15 V to 20 V. Both DC and PC protected the steel pipe adequately in the test soil. The mechanism of cathodic protection in the high-resistivity environment was identified as: (a) polarization to a “corrosion immunity” potential for the steel surface in the vicinity of crevice opening, (b) oxygen depletion for the solution in the interior of the crevice, and (c) a pH increase in the crevice and passivation of the steel in the alkaline environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: