Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The preparation, X-ray crystal structures, conductivity and optical properties of the salts, [ttf]3[W6O19]1, [ttf]3[Mo6O19]2(ttf = tetrathiafulvalene) and [tmtsf]3[W6O19]·2dmf 3(tmtsf = tetramethyltetraselenafulvalene) are reported. Crystal data: 1, triclinic, space group P, a= 9.965(3), b= 10.503(3), c= 10.634(3)Å, α= 71.93(2), β= 78.63(2), γ= 63.38(3), Z= 1, R= 0.020; 2, triclinic, space group P, a= 9.942(3), b= 10.417(3), c= 10.601(3), α= 72.33(2), β= 78.77(2), γ= 63.52(3)°, Z= 1, R= 0.030; 3, monoclinic, space group P21/c, a= 11.589(4), b= 19.385(5), c= 13.681(3), β= 99.53(2), Z= 2 and R= 0.049. In all the salts the organic molecules form trimerized stacks. A classical ring-over-double bond overlap is observed in 3, in contrast with 1 and 2 which present an unusual intra-trimer criss-cross overlap. In compound 3 the intra-trimer Se ⋯ Se (3.73–3.81 Å) contacts are shorter than those observed in [tmtsf]2X (X = PF6 or BF4) series. The inter-trimer Se ⋯ Se contacts (3.94–4.12 Å) are in the range of the van der Waals separation (4 Å). Short O ⋯ Se (3.17–3.30 Å) contacts are observed. Both electrical and optical measurements and also electronic band-structure calculations reveal that the three salts are semiconductors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Triki et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: