Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The susceptibility of Cu-Ni alloys to accelerated corrosion in sea water containing low sulfide concentrations has been investigated. Test alloys included wrought 90/10 Cu-Ni, 70/30 Cu-Ni and Ni-Cu, plus cast 70/30 Cu-Ni. Sheet type specimen exposures were performed in fresh flowing sea water at a test velocity of 2.4 m/s (8 ft/s), and simultaneous polarization resistance cell exposures were conducted at a test velocity of 1.2 m/s (4 ft/s). Sulfide concentrations included 0.01, 0.05, and 0.2 ppm from addition of Na2S to flowing sea water. The test sequence included continuous sulfide exposures ranging from 1 to 15 days, followed by 60 days exposure in natural sea water. Gravimetric corrosion rates, depth of attack, corrosion potentials, and instantaneous corrosion rate data were developed. Results showed that wrought 90/10 Cu-Ni was susceptible to accelerated attack in sea water containing 0.01 ppm sulfides and is attacked vigorously after exposure to 0.2 ppm sulfides in sea water. Wrought 70/30 Cu-Ni is similarly susceptible to sulfide induced pitting, but appears to require higher sulfide concentration to trigger attack. Cast 70/30 Cu-Ni and Ni-Cu are susceptible to accelerated corrosion in sulfide modified sea water, but modes of attack differ from wrought 90/10 and 70/30 Cu-Ni. Interaction of exposure (or system operating) variables is seen as a key factor in assessing susceptibility of Cu-Ni alloys to sulfide induced corrosion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gudas et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: