Key result
Ankle brachial index < 0.9 was significantly associated with a higher risk of composite cardiovascular events (adjusted HR 2.39) in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas interarm systolic blood pressure difference showed no prognostic value.
Why the study?
Increased IASBPD is associated with cardiovascular prognosis in the general population, but whether IASBPD or ABI is strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes remained to be evaluated.
Does ankle brachial index or interarm systolic blood pressure difference better predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Observational (n=446)
No
Does ankle brachial index or interarm systolic blood pressure difference better predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.9 is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality than interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABI <0.9 may aid risk stratification in type 2 diabetes; leaves open impact on outcomes or management.
Increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) is associated with cardiovascular prognosis in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate whether IASBPD or ankle brachial index (ABI) is strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.Total 446 type 2 diabetes followed up for a mean 5.8 years divided by ABI (<0.9 vs ≥0.9) or IASBPD (<10 vs ≥10 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for coronary artery disease, nonfatal stroke, carotid, or peripheral revascularization, amputations, and diabetic foot syndrome. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.Sixty-four composite events and 17 deaths were identified. The primary and secondary outcomes were higher than those in the group with ABI < 0.9 vs ABI ≥ 0.9 (32.8% vs 11.6%, P < .005 for primary outcome; 14.0% vs 2.3%, P < .005 for all-cause mortality) but IASBPD cannot exhibit a prognostic value. ABI < 0.9 was also the dominant risk factor of both endpoints demonstrated by multivariate Cox proportional analysis (composite events: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-4.53; P = .007; all-cause mortality: adjusted HR, 3.27: 95% CI, 1.91-5.60; P < .001).The ABI was more associated with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes than IASBPD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes (n=446). Ankle brachial index < 0.9 vs. Ankle brachial index ≥ 0.9 was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for coronary artery disease, nonfatal stroke, carotid or peripheral revascularization, amputations, and diabetic foot syndrome (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.26-4.53, p=0.007). Ankle brachial index < 0.9 was significantly associated with a higher risk of composite cardiovascular events (adjusted HR 2.39) in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas interarm systolic blood pressure difference showed no prognostic value.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: