Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to provide reasons for the poor sarcoma-related survival in patients with radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS). METHODS: We performed a case-control study comparing sarcoma-related survival of 98 patients with RIS to that of 239 sporadic high-grade malignant sarcomas. RESULTS: The cumulative sarcoma-related 5-year survival was 32% (95% confidence interval (CI): 22-42) for patients with RIS vs 51% (95% CI: 44-58) for controls (P<0.001). Female gender, central tumour site and incomplete surgical remission were significantly more frequent among RIS patients than in controls. In multivariate analysis incomplete surgical remission (hazard ratio (HR) 4.48, 95% CI: 3.08-6.52), metastases at presentation (HR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.95-4.41), microscopic tumour necrosis (HR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.27-2.78) and central tumour site (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18-2.47) remained significant adverse prognostic factors, but not sarcoma category (RIS vs sporadic). CONCLUSION: The poor prognosis of RIS patients are not due to the previous radiotherapy per se, but related to the unfavourable factors - central tumour site, incomplete surgical remission, microscopic tumour necrosis and the presence of metastases, the two former factors overrepresented in RIS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjerkehagen et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: