Why the study?
Cardiac function quantification from MRI remains not fully automatic in clinical practice, partly due to a shortage of training data covering all relevant cardiovascular disease phenotypes.
Does pre-training a deep learning network on synthetically generated cardiac MRI improve the prediction accuracy of ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to training on real data alone?
Does pre-training a deep learning network on synthetically generated cardiac MRI improve the prediction accuracy of ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to training on real data alone?
Synthetically generating cardiac MRI data to pre-train deep learning models significantly improves the accuracy of automated ventricular volume and ejection fraction quantification, especially when real training data is imbalanced.
May improve automated EF quantification when real data are limited; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Although having been the subject of intense research over the years, cardiac function quantification from MRI is still not a fully automatic process in the clinical practice. This is partly due to the shortage of training data covering all relevant cardiovascular disease phenotypes. We propose to synthetically generate short axis CINE MRI using a generative adversarial model to expand the available data sets that consist of predominantly healthy subjects to include more cases with reduced ejection fraction. We introduce a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict the end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and implicitly the ejection fraction from cardiac MRI without explicit segmentation. The left ventricle volume predictions were compared to the ground truth values, showing superior accuracy compared to state-of-the-art segmentation methods. We show that using synthetic data generated for pre-training a CNN significantly improves the prediction compared to only using the limited amount of available data, when the training set is imbalanced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gheorghiță et al. (2021) studied Cardiovascular disease (n=5,775). Pre-training on synthetically generated cardiac MRI data (RSP) vs. Training solely on real case data (RSO) was evaluated on Root Mean Square (RMS) error for Ejection Fraction (EF) prediction (Dataset 1) (p=< 0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: