Background Fatigue is a common and debilitating side effect of chemotherapy, negatively affecting treatment adherence and survival. Chemotherapy alters gut microbiome composition, and accumulating evidence suggests that gut microbes contribute to chemotherapy-induced fatigue. Because the gut microbiome is modifiable through targeted interventions, such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), microbiome modulation has emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate treatment-related toxicities. To understand the impact of FMT interventions across the gut-brain axis, studying rodent chemotherapy models that simultaneously capture behavioral side effects and gastrointestinal pathology is warranted. Methods Patient-reported fatigue and diarrhea were assessed in breast cancer patients before and during chemotherapy ( n = 67). In parallel, mice were treated with chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] or paclitaxel) with or without FMT derived from pre-chemotherapy fecal material. Outcomes included fatigue (in-cage locomotion and voluntary wheel running), gut microbiome composition (16S rRNA sequencing), intestinal and brain gene/protein expression (RT-qPCR, single-cell RNA sequencing, and/or multiplex electrochemiluminescence assay), and circulating inflammatory markers. Results In patients, increased fatigue during chemotherapy was associated with worse diarrhea and shifts in gut microbiome composition. In mice receiving 5-FU, FMT produced mild-to-moderate benefits, most notably preserving body mass, with milder and transient benefits for fatigue. FMT partially normalized gut bacterial taxa, reduced 5-FU-induced colonic Il1b expression, and prevented chemotherapy-related increases in brain Aqp4 . FMT did not attenuate other inflammatory effects induced by 5-FU or paclitaxel. Conclusion These findings are consistent with a role for gut microbes in chemotherapy-induced fatigue and suggest that FMT is not universally beneficial, with effects varying by chemotherapy drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Águila et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: