Key result
EuroSCORE II and SinoSCORE demonstrated moderate discrimination for in-hospital mortality (C-statistics 0.728 and 0.716), though EuroSCORE II underestimated mortality in high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Does EuroSCORE II or SinoSCORE accurately predict in-hospital mortality in Chinese patients undergoing CABG?
Population
4,507 adult Chinese patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution between…
Comparison
Risk stratification using EuroSCORE II vs Risk stratification using SinoSCORE
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
in-hospital
Authors
Loading...
Supports cautious EuroSCORE II use for Chinese CABG risk assessment; leaves open recalibration needs in high-risk patients and SinoSCORE validation.
Observational (n=4,507)
No
Does EuroSCORE II or SinoSCORE accurately predict in-hospital mortality in Chinese patients undergoing CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.728% vs 0.716%
EuroSCORE II provides reasonable overall mortality prediction for Chinese patients undergoing CABG but underestimates risk in high-risk patients, whereas SinoSCORE overestimates mortality across most subgroups.
Bai et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=4,507). EuroSCORE II vs. SinoSCORE was evaluated on In-hospital mortality discrimination (C-statistic). EuroSCORE II and SinoSCORE demonstrated moderate discrimination for in-hospital mortality (C-statistics 0.728 and 0.716), though EuroSCORE II underestimated mortality in high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: