Key result
The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a significant decrease in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction (IRR 0.516) compared to pre-pandemic periods, without significant changes in delay times or mortality.
Why the study?
Declining presentations for myocardial infarction were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic, but data on hospital admissions, delay times, and mortality during lockdowns were inconsistent.
Does the COVID-19 lockdown reduce hospital admissions for myocardial infarction?
Meta-Analysis (n=81,163)
Yes
Does the COVID-19 lockdown reduce hospital admissions for myocardial infarction?
COVID-19 lockdowns were associated with a significant ~48% reduction in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction, without significant changes in delay times or in-hospital mortality for those who did present.
Reduced MI admissions during lockdown may reflect care avoidance; leaves open true incidence changes versus untreated events.
BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of declining numbers of patients presenting with myocardial infarction was reported from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic onward. It was thought that measures introduced to stem the pandemic, such as the lockdown, contributed to this development. However, the data on hospital admissions, delay times, and mortality are not consistent. METHODS: Our systematic literature review and meta-analysis embraced studies reporting the number of hospital admissions of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and/or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) during lockdown episodes. We also collected data on patient- and system-related delay times and on mortality. RESULTS: Data from 27 studies on a total of 81 163 patients were included in our meta-analysis. We found that the number of hospital admissions of patients with myocardial infarction was significantly lower during the lockdown than before the pandemic (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.516 [0.403; 0.660], I2 = 98%). This was true both for patients with STEMI (IRR = 0.620 [0.514; 0.746], I2 = 96%) and for patients with NSTEMI (IRR = 0.454 [0.354; 0.584], I2 = 96%). However, we found no significant difference in the time from hospital admission to cardiac catheterization, or in mortality, in relation to the time from symptom onset to first medical contact. CONCLUSION: In this study, we have shown that the lockdown due to COVID-19 was associated with a marked decline in the number of hospital admissions of patients with myocardial infarction. As no significant effect on delay times or mortality was observed, it seems that timely medical care continued to be delivered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baumhardt et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute myocardial infarction (n=81,163). COVID-19 lockdown vs. Pre-lockdown period was evaluated on Hospital admission rate for myocardial infarction (mean daily admissions) (IRR 0.516, 95% CI 0.403-0.660). The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with a significant decrease in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction (IRR 0.516) compared to pre-pandemic periods, without significant changes in delay times or mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: