Key result
Quality assurance and improvement prioritization is required to reduce interinstitutional variability and further improve congenital heart surgery outcomes, which currently have a 3% mortality rate.
Why the study?
Despite improved congenital heart surgery outcomes, significant interinstitutional variability persists, especially for higher-risk and complex patients.
Quality assurance and improvement initiatives are necessary to reduce interinstitutional variability and meet the growing demands of stakeholders in congenital heart surgery.
Prioritizing quality assurance may reduce interinstitutional variability in congenital heart surgery; leaves open optimal strategies to further lower mortality.
Congenital heart disease is a major public health concern in the United States. Outcomes of surgery for children with congenital heart disease have dramatically improved over the last several decades with current aggregate operative mortality rates approximating 3%, inclusive of all ages and defects. However, there remains significant variability among institutions, especially for higher-risk and more complex patients. As health care moves toward the quadruple aim of improving patient experience, improving the health of populations, lowering costs, and increasing satisfaction among providers, congenital heart surgery programs must evolve to meet the growing scrutiny, demands, and expectations of numerous stakeholders. Improved outcomes and reduced interinstitutional variability are achieved through prioritization of quality assurance and improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy W. Pettitt (2020) conducted a review in Congenital heart disease. Quality assurance and improvement was evaluated. Quality assurance and improvement prioritization is required to reduce interinstitutional variability and further improve congenital heart surgery outcomes, which currently have a 3% mortality rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: