Research Article| September 01, 2009 A Fast, Non-saturating Magnitude Estimator for Great Earthquakes Peter Bormann; Peter Bormann GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany pb65@gmx.net (P. B.) saul@gfz-potsdam.de (J. S.) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Joachim Saul Joachim Saul GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany pb65@gmx.net (P. B.) saul@gfz-potsdam.de (J. S.) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Seismological Research Letters (2009) 80 (5): 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.808 Article history first online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Peter Bormann, Joachim Saul; A Fast, Non-saturating Magnitude Estimator for Great Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 2009;; 80 (5): 808–816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.5.808 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search The concept of a body-wave magnitude was developed by Gutenberg (1945a, 1945b) using intermediate to long-period displacement recordings of earthquakes with magnitudes 6 and above. In contrast to the commonly determined short-period P-wave magnitude mb that already saturates at values between about 6 and 7, mB yields reliable magnitude estimates up to magnitudes of about 8 (Abe 1981; Kanamori 1983; Bormann and Saul 2008). Since Gutenberg proposed to measure the maximum ratio of displacement amplitude A divided by its period T, mB is related to ground motion velocity and... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bormann et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: