Key result
Modern surgical management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy significantly decreased leak-associated mortality compared to the historical era (3.3% vs 43%; P=0.016).
Why the study?
Does modern surgical management reduce leak-associated mortality following esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomoses compared to historical management?
Cohort (n=621)
Does modern surgical management reduce leak-associated mortality following esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomoses compared to historical management?
Hazard Ratio: 18.3 (95% CI 1.9–180)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.3% vs 43%
p-value: p=0.016
Modern surgical management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy has significantly reduced leak-associated mortality, suggesting that concerns about this complication should not dictate the choice of surgical approach.
Supports modern leak management after esophagectomy; leaves open whether this justifies intrathoracic anastomoses pending prospective data.
In Brief Objectives: Assess outcomes following intrathoracic leaks after esophagectomy from 1970 to 2004 to evaluate the impact of evolving surgical and perioperative techniques on leak-associated mortality (LAM). Summary Background Data: An intrathoracic leak following esophagectomy has historically been considered a catastrophic event, with mortality as high as 71%. Concerns about this complication often affect choice of surgical approach for esophagectomy. Methods: A retrospective review of all esophagectomies for cancer from 1970 to 2004 (n = 1223) was performed. Outcomes following intrathoracic anastomoses (n = 621) were analyzed by era: historical 1970–1986 (n = 145) and modern 1987–2004 (n = 476). Results: There was no difference in the frequency of leak between the time intervals (4.8% versus 6.3%, P = 0.5). Despite a significant increase in the use of preoperative chemoradiation (1% versus 42%, P < 0.001) in the historical versus modern era, the overall mortality decreased from 11% to 2.5% (P < 0.001). The LAM was markedly reduced from 43% to 3.3% (P = 0.016). Factors associated with LAM included failure to use enteral nutrition (HR 13.22, CI 1.8–96.8) and era in which the surgery was performed (HR 18.3, 1.9–180). Other differences included an increased proportion of successful reoperations for leak control (11/30 versus 0/7, P = 0.08) and use of reinforcing muscle flaps (7/11). In the modern era, perioperative mortality is not significantly different for patients with or without intrathoracic leaks (3.3% versus 2.5%, P = 0.55), nor is long-term survival (P = 0.16). Conclusions: Modern surgical management of intrathoracic leaks results in no increased mortality and has no impact on long-term survival. Clinical decisions regarding the use of intrathoracic anastomoses should not be affected by concerns of increased mortality from leak. An intrathoracic leak following esophagectomy has historically been considered a catastrophic event, with mortality as high as 71%. This retrospective review of 621 intrathoracic esophagectomies shows a decrease in leak-associated mortality from 43% to 3.3%. Clinical decisions regarding the use of intrathoracic anastomoses should not be affected by concerns of increased mortality from leak.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Esophageal cancer requiring esophagectomy (n=621). Modern era (1987-2004) surgical management vs. Historical era (1970-1986) surgical management was evaluated on Leak-associated mortality (LAM) (HR 18.3, 95% CI 1.9-180, p=0.016). Modern surgical management of intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy significantly decreased leak-associated mortality compared to the historical era (3.3% vs 43%; P=0.016).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: