Key result
Early discharge (≤4 days) after kidney transplantation was not associated with inferior 1-year patient survival (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.66-0.84) compared to routine discharge (5-7 days).
Why the study?
National analyses examining the association between discharge timing and post-transplant outcomes after kidney transplantation were lacking.
Does early discharge (LOS ≤ 4 days) maintain outcomes and reduce costs in adult kidney transplant recipients without delayed graft function?
Cohort (n=61,798)
Yes
Does early discharge (LOS ≤ 4 days) maintain outcomes and reduce costs in adult kidney transplant recipients without delayed graft function?
Early discharge (≤4 days) after kidney transplantation in patients without delayed graft function is cost-efficient and not associated with worse 1-year survival or 90-day readmission compared to routine discharge.
Supports early discharge consideration in selected kidney recipients without DGF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Early discharge after surgical procedures has been proposed as a novel strategy to reduce healthcare expenditures. However, national analyses of the association between discharge timing and post-transplant outcomes following kidney transplantation are lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult kidney transplant recipients without delayed graft function from 2014 to 2019 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Recipients were divided into Early (LOS ≤ 4 days), Routine (LOS 5-7), and Delayed (LOS > 7) cohorts. RESULTS: Of 61 798 kidney transplant recipients, 26 821 (43%) were discharged Early and 23 279 (38%) Routine. Compared to Routine, patients discharged Early were younger (52 [41-61] vs. 54 [43-62] years, p < .001), less commonly Black (33% vs. 34%, p < .001), and more frequently had private insurance (41% vs. 35%, p < .001). After adjustment, Early discharge was not associated with inferior 1-year patient survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] .74, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.66-0.84) or increased likelihood of nonelective readmission at 90-days (HR .93, CI .89-.97), relative to Routine discharge. Discharging all Routine patients as Early would result in an estimated cost saving of ∼$40 million per year. Multi-level modeling of post-transplantation LOS revealed that 28.8% of the variation in LOS was attributable to interhospital differences rather than patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge after kidney transplantation appears to be cost-efficient and not associated with inferior post-transplant survival or increased readmission at 90 days. Future work should elucidate the benefits of early discharge and develop standardized enhanced recovery protocols to be implemented across transplant centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhtiyar et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Kidney transplantation without delayed graft function (n=61,798). Early discharge (length of stay ≤ 4 days) vs. Routine discharge (length of stay 5-7 days) was evaluated on 1-year patient survival (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84). Early discharge (≤4 days) after kidney transplantation was not associated with inferior 1-year patient survival (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.66-0.84) compared to routine discharge (5-7 days).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: