We revisit the canonical policy of eliminating capital taxation by increasing labor taxation in a endogenous-labor, heterogeneous-agent model with income and wealth heterogeneity, when the government is subject to a strict (per-period) balanced-budget constraint.By contrast with its non-budget neutral equivalent -associated with a constant tax rate over time and a permanent increase in the level of public debt -we show that the obtained endogenous path for the labor tax rate is sharply increasing in the initial period and decreasing over time.The policy then generates a deeper recession in the short-run and a greater expansion in the long-run, as well as a smaller decline in wealth inequality associated with a reduced incentive to save for precautionary motives.Overall, the policy still generates significant losses in average welfare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dufourt et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: