Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
ECG diagnosis of regular BCT remains challenging; leaves open need for validated algorithms and adjunctive testing.
The reliable and accurate diagnosis of regular broad complex tachycardia (BCT) by the ECG is a goal that has eluded clinicians and electrophysiologists alike for years. This article explores the reason for this by first giving an historical account on the development of the subject. Next, the electrophysiological mechanisms of ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction, and preexcited tachycardia, the three main differential diagnoses for regular BCT, according to the latest knowledge from cellular and clinical electrophysiology study will be reviewed, together with considerations on how such understanding may help account for the manifestations of these tachycardias on the ECG and the difficulty in distinguishing between them. Finally, the use of electrophysiological study as the criterion standard for diagnosing regular BCT, as has been the case in most studies on the subject, will be critiqued in terms of the potential for misdiagnosis by the method and the use of any ECG diagnostic algorithms developed with its aid in the acute medical care setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: