Key result
A matrix-multiplying ADC (MMADC) achieved a normalized RMS error of 0.018 and estimated energy savings of 13× and 29× compared to conventional systems for ECG and image classification.
Effect estimate: 13× and 29× energy savings
Implementing matrix multiplication directly within an analog-to-digital converter can provide substantial energy savings for wearable medical sensors, such as ECG arrhythmia detectors.
May extend battery life in wearable ECG sensors; leaves open clinical validation of detection accuracy.
In wearable and implantable medical-sensor applications, low-energy classification systems are of importance for deriving high-quality inferences locally within the device. Given that sensor instrumentation is typically followed by A-D conversion, this paper presents a system implementation wherein the majority of the computations required for classification are implemented within the ADC. To achieve this, first an algorithmic formulation is presented that combines linear feature extraction and classification into a single matrix transformation. Second, a matrix-multiplying ADC (MMADC) is presented that enables multiplication between an analog input sample and a digital multiplier, with negligible additional energy beyond that required for A-D conversion. Two systems mapped to the MMADC are demonstrated: (1) an ECG-based cardiac arrhythmia detector; and (2) an image-pixel-based facial gender detector. The RMS error over all multiplication performed, normalized to the RMS of ideal multiplication results is 0.018. Further, compared to idealized versions of conventional systems, the energy savings obtained are estimated to be 13× and 29×, respectively, while achieving similar level of performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) studied Cardiac arrhythmia (application example). Matrix-multiplying ADC (MMADC) vs. Idealized versions of conventional systems was evaluated on RMS error and energy savings (13× and 29× energy savings). A matrix-multiplying ADC (MMADC) achieved a normalized RMS error of 0.018 and estimated energy savings of 13× and 29× compared to conventional systems for ECG and image classification.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: