Key result
Del Nido cardioplegia was associated with a significantly longer intensive care unit stay (median 4 vs 2 days) compared to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia in adult patients with a low ejection fraction, though hospital mortality and clinical outcomes did not differ.
Why the study?
The safety and effect of Del Nido cardioplegia compared with intermittent warm blood cardioplegia had not been thoroughly evaluated in adult patients with low ejection fraction undergoing cardiac surgery.
Does Del Nido cardioplegia improve safety outcomes in adult patients with low ejection fraction undergoing cardiac surgery compared to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia?
Cohort (n=154)
No
Does Del Nido cardioplegia improve safety outcomes in adult patients with low ejection fraction undergoing cardiac surgery compared to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia?
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Del Nido cardioplegia appears to be a safe alternative to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia in adult patients with low ejection fraction undergoing cardiac surgery, with comparable clinical outcomes despite an association with longer ICU stays.
Longer ICU stay with Del Nido cardioplegia warrants caution in low-EF adults; leaves open safety equivalence to warm blood cardioplegia.
Background Del Nido cardioplegia was recently introduced to adult cardiac surgery with encouraging results. The effect of Del Nido cardioplegia in patients with low ejection fraction (EF) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The objective of this study was to assess the safety of Del Nido cardioplegia in adult patients with low EF compared to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia. Results During 2018 and 2019, 73 adult patients with an EF of ≤ 40% underwent cardiac surgery using Del Nido cardioplegia. The patients were compared to a historical cohort of consecutive patients with low EF who had intermitted warm blood cardioplegia (n= 81). Patients who had Del Nido cardioplegia had significantly lower EuroSCORE II (2.73 (1.7–4.1) vs. 4.5 (2.4–7.4),P= 0.004). There were no differences in creatinine clearance and preoperative echocardiographic data between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were non-significantly lower with Del Nido cardioplegia. There were no differences in stroke and postoperative echocardiographic data between the groups. No hospital mortality was reported in both groups. Peak troponin levels were significantly higher in patients who had Del Nido cardioplegia (0.88 (0.58–1.47) vs. 0.7 (0.44–1.01) ng/dL;P= 0.01); however, after multivariable regression analysis, cardiopulmonary bypass time was the only predictor of postoperative troponin level (coefficient 0.005 (95% CI: 0.003–0.008);P< 0.001). ICU stay was significantly longer in patients who had Del Nido cardioplegia (4 (3–6) vs. 2(1–4) days,P< 0.001), while postoperative hospital stay did not differ between the groups. After multivariable regression, the use of intermittent warm blood cardioplegia was significantly associated with shorter ICU stay (coefficient − 1.80 (95% CI − 3.06 – -0.55);P= 0.01). Conclusions Prolonged ICU was reported with Del Nido cardioplegia; however, there were no differences in the duration of hospital stay and the clinical outcomes between the groups. Despite the proven efficacy of intermittent warm blood cardioplegia, the use of Del Nido cardioplegia might be safe in patients with low EF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arafat et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Low ejection fraction (≤ 40%) requiring cardiac surgery (n=154). Del Nido cardioplegia vs. Intermittent warm blood cardioplegia was evaluated on Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay (days) (p=<0.001). Del Nido cardioplegia was associated with a significantly longer intensive care unit stay (median 4 vs 2 days) compared to intermittent warm blood cardioplegia in adult patients with a low ejection fraction, though hospital mortality and clinical outcomes did not differ.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: