Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classical permutation enumeration algorithms encounter special cases requiring additional computation every nth permutation when generating the n! permutations on n marks. Four new algorithms have the attribute that special cases occur every n(n—1) permutations. Two of the algorithms produce the next permutation with a single exchange of two marks. The other two algorithms infrequently exchange more than two marks, but the rules for generating the next permutation are very simple. Performance tests which have counted execution of assignment statements, comparisons, arithmetic operations, and subscripted array references have shown superiority of the new algorithms compared to Boothroyd's implementation of M.B. Well's algorithm and Ehrlich's implementation of the Johnson-Trotter algorithm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fred Ives (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: