This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) evolved in arid environments as a water-saving alternative to C 3 photosynthesis. There is great interest in engineering more drought-resistant crop species by introducing CAM into C 3 plants. However, one of the open questions is whether full CAM or alternative water-saving flux modes would be more productive in the environments typically experienced by C 3 crops. To study the effect of temperature and relative humidity on plant metabolism we coupled a time-resolved diel model of leaf metabolism to an environment-dependent gas-exchange model. This model allowed us to study the emergence of CAM or CAM-like behaviour as a result of a trade-off between leaf productivity and water-saving. We show that vacuolar storage capacity in the leaf is a major determinant of the extent of CAM and shapes the occurrence of phase II and IV of the CAM cycle. Moreover, the model allows us to study alternative flux routes and we identify mitochondrial isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) and an isocitrate-citrate-proline-2OG cycle as a potential contributor to initial carbon fixation at night. Simulations across a wide range of environmental parameters show that the water-saving potential of CAM strongly depends on the environment and that the additional water-saving effect of carbon fixation by ICDH can reach up to 4% for the conditions tested.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Töpfer et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: