Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether immunoblotting is capable of substantiating the posttreatment clinical assessment of patients with erythema migrans (EM), the hallmark of early Lyme borreliosis. METHODS: In 50 patients, seroreactivity to different antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato was analyzed by a recombinant immunoblot test (IB) in consecutive serum samples from a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Antigens in the IgG test were decorin-binding protein A, internal fragment of p41 (p41i), outer surface protein C (OspC), p39, variable major protein-like sequence expressed (VlsE), p58 and p100; those in the IgM test were p41i, OspC and p39. Immune responses were correlated with clinical and treatment-related parameters. RESULTS: Positive IB results were found in 50% before, in 57% directly after therapy and in 44% by the end of the follow-up for the IgG class, and in 36, 43 and 12% for the IgM class. In acute and convalescence phase sera, VlsE was most immunogenic on IgG testing (60 and 70%), and p41i (46 and 57%) and OspC (40 and 57%) for the IgM class. By the end of the follow-up, only the anti-p41i IgM response was significantly decreased to 24%. CONCLUSIONS: No correlation was found between IB results and treatment-related parameters. Thus, immunoblotting does not add to the clinical assessment of EM patients after treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glatz et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: