Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The mechanism of butadiene and isoprene polymerization in the presence of CpTiCl 3 −MAO has been investigated by means of ab initio computations. According to experimental evidence, the catalytically active species are assumed to be [CpTi−P] + organotitanium cations (P = growing polymer chain). The results show that (i) in the active species, P is coordinated to Ti both with the π allyl group of its ending unit and with the π bond of the penultimate unit; (ii) the cis η 4 coordination of an incoming monomer to the active species requires the breakage of the latter interaction and the change of the allyl coordination mode from η 3 to η 1 . That significant rearrangement of P is predicted to be the rate-determining step of the whole propagation reaction and is predicted to be much easier when the ending unit of P is butenyl rather than 2-methylbutenyl. That finding accounts both for the large difference observed in the homopolymerization rates of butadiene and isoprene and for the fact that in copolymerizations the two monomers exhibit almost the same reactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peluso et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: