Key result
Two blood pressure measurements were more strongly related to stroke risk over 17 to 21 years of follow-up than a single measurement.
Why the study?
Does measuring blood pressure on two occasions improve the estimation of stroke risk compared to a single measurement in a general population?
Population
9,245 individuals from 2 prospective cohort studies in Scotland
Comparison
Blood pressure measured on 2 occasions vs Blood pressure measured on a single occasion
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
17 and 21 years
Authors
Loading...
May refine long-term stroke risk estimates with repeated BP readings; extends cohort data but should not yet change practice.
Cohort (n=9,245)
Yes
Does measuring blood pressure on two occasions improve the estimation of stroke risk compared to a single measurement in a general population?
Two blood pressure measurements separated by several years provide a more accurate estimate of long-term stroke risk than a single measurement, reducing risk misclassification.
Hart et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in Stroke risk (n=9,245). Two blood pressure measurements vs. One blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Stroke, defined as stroke mortality or hospital admission for stroke. Two blood pressure measurements were more strongly related to stroke risk over 17 to 21 years of follow-up than a single measurement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: