This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Four complexes of the general form cis-Ru(phen?)(dcb)(NCS)2, where dcb is 4,4?-(CO2H)2-2,2?-bipyridine and phen? is 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), 4,7-(C6H5)2-phen (Ph2-phen), 4,7-(CH3)2-phen (Me2-phen), or 3,4,7,8-(CH3)4-phen (Me4-phen), were anchored to mesoporous TiO2 thin films for applications as sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The compounds displayed metal based reductions Eo(RuIII/II) = 1.01 ? 0.05 V vs NHE and were potent reductants competent of excited-state electron transfer to TiO2 with yields ?inj ? 0.75 in acetonitrile electrolytes. Average charge recombination rate constants, kcr, abstracted from nanosecond transient absorption measurements, and the apparent diffusion coefficients for lateral hole-hopping, abstracted from chronabsorptometry measurements, showed the same sensitizer dependency: Ru(Me4-phen) > Ru(Ph2-phen) > Ru(Me2-phen) ? Ru(phen). When used in operational solar cells, Ru(Ph2-phen) was most optimal with an efficiency of (6.6 ? 0.5)% in ionic liquids under 1 sun illumination. The superior performance of Ru(Ph2-phen) was traced to a higher injection yield and more efficient regeneration due to an unusually small sensitivity of kcr to the number of injected electrons.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sampaio et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: