Key result
Activated Clotting Time (ACT) did not correlate with unfractionated heparin dose, aPTT, or anti-Xa in ICU patients, indicating it is unreliable for monitoring low-dose heparin in this population.
Why the study?
Information was limited regarding the monitoring of low-dose unfractionated heparin by Activated Clotting Time.
Does ACT accurately monitor low-dose unfractionated heparin compared to aPTT and anti-Xa in healthy volunteers and ICU patients?
Observational (n=114)
Does ACT accurately monitor low-dose unfractionated heparin compared to aPTT and anti-Xa in healthy volunteers and ICU patients?
ACT is not a reliable method for monitoring low-dose unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients, as it does not correlate with UFH dose or established methods like aPTT and anti-Xa.
ACT lacks support for low-dose UFH monitoring in ICU; hypothesis-generating for trials comparing aPTT or anti-Xa guidance.
Dose adjustment of unfractionated heparin (UFH) anticoagulation is an important factor to reduce hemorrhagic events. High doses of heparin can be monitored by Activated Clotting Time (ACT). Because of limited information about the monitoring of low-dose heparin we assessed monitoring by ACT, aPTT and anti-Xa. Blood samples from healthy volunteers (n = 54) were treated ex vivo with increasing UFH doses (0-0.4 IU/ml). Samples from ICU-patients (n = 60), were drawn during continuous UFH infusion. Simultaneous ACT measurements were performed using iSTAT and Hemochron. In UFH treated blood, iSTAT and Hemochron showed a significant change of ACT at ≥0.075 IU/ml and ≥0.1 IU/ml UFH, respectively. In ICU-patients no relationship between ACT and either UFH dose, aPTT and anti-Xa was observed. Hemochron was affected by antithrombin and platelet count. iSTAT was sensitive to CRP and hematocrit. A moderate correlation was identified between UFH dose and aPTT (R 2 = 0.196) or anti-Xa (R 2 = 0.162). In heparin-spiked blood, ACT is sensitive to heparin at levels of ≥0.1 IU/ml heparin. In ICU-patients, ACT did not correlate with UFH dose or other established methods. Both systems were differently influenced by certain parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wehner et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Healthy adults and critically ill patients (n=114). Low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) was evaluated on Correlation between ACT and UFH dose, aPTT, and anti-Xa. Activated Clotting Time (ACT) did not correlate with unfractionated heparin dose, aPTT, or anti-Xa in ICU patients, indicating it is unreliable for monitoring low-dose heparin in this population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: