This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The kisspeptins are critical regulators of reproduction and a therapeutic target for reproductive disease. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) or peripheral injection of kisspeptin potently stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal (HPG) axis via gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). However, little is known regarding the effects of kisspeptin administration on testicular function. We investigated the mechanism(s) of kisspeptin-induced testicular degeneration in the rat. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Kisspeptin-54 (50 nmol.day(-1)) was continuously administered subcutaneously (6 h to 3 days) to male Wistar rats and reproductive hormones and testicular histology analysed. We also investigated the effects of a single subcutaneous injection of 0.5, 5 or 50 nmol kisspeptin-54. In order to determine whether the testicular degeneration observed is peripherally or centrally mediated, we investigated effects of i.c.v. injections of 5 nmol kisspeptin-54 and pre-administered a GnRH-receptor antagonist (cetrorelix) to rats peripherally treated with kisspeptin-54. KEY RESULTS: Continuous subcutaneous administration of kisspeptin-54 caused testicular degeneration after only 12 h, when gonadotrophins were still markedly raised, suggesting that the degeneration is independent of the desensitization of the HPG axis to kisspeptin-54. Furthermore, a single subcutaneous injection of kisspeptin-54 caused dose-dependent testicular degeneration. Continuous kisspeptin-54 administration is thus not required to cause testicular degeneration. Pretreatment with cetrorelix blocked kisspeptin-induced testicular degeneration, and a single i.c.v. injection of kisspeptin-54 caused testicular degeneration, suggesting it is GnRH-mediated. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Kisspeptin-induced testicular degeneration appears to be centrally mediated, and result from acute hyper-stimulation of the HPG axis. Doses must be carefully considered if kisspeptin is to be used therapeutically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: