Why the study?
Uhls anomaly is an extremely rare congenital heart defect with fewer than 100 reported cases, requiring early recognition, medical stabilization, and appropriate surgical planning to improve quality of life.
For Uhl's anomaly, surgical management tailored to hemodynamics, such as a bidirectional Glenn or single ventricle pathway, is recommended, reserving heart transplantation for when other options fail.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support hemodynamic-tailored palliation in Uhl's anomaly; leaves open need for prospective data before practice change.
Introduction: Uhls anomaly is an extremely rare congenital heart defect characterized by partial or complete absence of right ventricular myocardium. Less than 100 cases have been reported in the literature. Survival depends on the severity of the right ventricular dysfunction. The age at presentation is varied but usually presents in infancy or found during autopsy. Diagnosis is made by echocardiogram (ECHO), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and histopathological examination. Medical management of this condition understanding the pathology is not possible. Surgical treatment includes single ventricle strategy, one and a half ventricle repair with partial right ventriculectomy, Fontan procedure, and cardiac transplantation. Early recognition of the anomaly, institution of drugs that improves cardiac function and right surgical planning may improve the quality of life.Areas covered: An extensive literature search has been done from many Pubmed and Scopus-indexed journals pertaining to various aspects of Uhls anomaly including history of the disease, etiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, diagnostic aids, and medical and surgical management.Expert opinion: Depending on the hemodynamics, a bidirectional Glenn which is septectomy or a single ventricle pathway would be a better approach. Of course heart transplantation would be the last choice when other surgical options are defied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cherian et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: