Why the study?
Are UK-derived reference ranges for heart rate and respiratory rate applicable to socioeconomically disadvantaged children in South Africa?
Are UK-derived reference ranges for heart rate and respiratory rate applicable to socioeconomically disadvantaged children in South Africa?
UK-derived reference ranges for heart and respiratory rates in children can be applied to socioeconomically disadvantaged children in developing countries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support UK reference ranges in disadvantaged South African children; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The authors have recently presented reference ranges for heart rate and respiratory rate in healthy resting schoolchildren, aged 4-16 years, in the United Kingdom. There are no similar ranges for children in the developing world. AIMS: To undertake a study in Cape Town, South Africa, to establish whether the UK ranges may be applied to socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. METHODS: Data on 346 children in a township school were recorded; their height, weight, heart rate, and respiratory rate were compared to the UK ranges. RESULTS: The two groups plotted closely together by height and weight on the UK 90 growth reference charts. There was no difference in heart rate between the two groups, and a difference of 0.46 breathes per minutes in respiratory rate, which is not felt to be of clinical significance. CONCLUSION: The reference rages of heart and respiratory rate derived in the UK may be applied to children in developing world situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee Wallis (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: