Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Broad spoilage of apples by either bacterial pathogens or fungal pathogens after harvest can be devastating, resulting in considerable economic loss. Chitosan is a biodegradable, non-toxic antimicrobial but the antimicrobial activity of chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) is increased with their larger surface area to volume ratio and better interaction with the microbial membrane. Method: Chitosan and CSNPs (bulk 0.5–2.0%, CSNP 0.25–1.0%) were prepared for determination of their antimicrobial activity vitro & IN VIVO against six spoilage microorganisms for a period of 7 days to mimic realistic storage conditions. Results Significant dose-dependent antimicrobial effect observed across treatments. In vitro and in vivo log reductions obtained against P. fluorescens were as high as 2.84 to 3.17 and 4.00, respectively, for 1.0% CSNPs. This was confirmed by the statistically equivalent efficacy of 0.5% CSNP treatment to that of 2.0% bulk chitosan, which implies a 75% decrease in active material. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the potential of CSNPs as a higher efficient and green alternative candidate to replace the conventional post-harvest restoration methods for apple fruits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
daham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: