Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a new 30-min algorithm for high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT, Prostasoft 3.5) in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 108 men (mean age 66 years) with bothersome LUTS were treated with the new TUMT protocol. All patients were evaluated using a standard assessment at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after TUMT. The evaluation included the assessment of objective and subjective outcome measures, with a urodynamic evaluation using pressure-flow analysis, and the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. In general, the International Prostate Symptom Score improved from a mean of 20.0 at baseline to a mean of 9.3 at 6 months after treatment. The maximum urinary flow improved from 9.4 mL/s to 14.6 mL/s at 6 months. The mean duration of catheterization was 17.9 days. The urodynamic evaluation showed a change from the obstructed to the equivocal zone on the Abrams-Griffith nomogram. There were no serious complications. Urgency and frequency were the most frequent side-effects after treatment; these all resolved within 3 months. CONCLUSION: High-energy TUMT using the new high-dose Prostasoft 3.5 protocol appears to be a safe and effective treatment. The faster procedure improves the tolerance of the treatment. The subjective and objective improvements were significant and the treatment-related morbidity low. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the durability of this new treatment protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosette et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: