The grafting of “living” polystyrene- block -poly(1,3-cyclohexadiene)- block -styryllithium and poly(1,3-cylclohexadiene)- block -polystyryllithium onto C 60 yielded, respectively, 6- star -fullerene[styrene- block -poly(1,3-cyclohexadiene)- block -polystyrene] and 6- star -fullerene[polystyrene- block -poly(1,3-cyclohexadiene)]. Selective dehydrogenation of these macromolecules yielded, respectively, 6- star -fullerene[styrene- block -poly(1,4-phenylene)- block -polystyrene], C 60 (st−PPP−PS) 6, and 6- star -fullerene[polystyrene- block -poly(1,4-phenylene)], C 60 (PS−PPP) 6 . 6- star -Fullerene[poly(1,4-phenylene)- block -polystyrene] could not be synthesized via this route as fullerene−poly(1,3-cyclohexadiene) bonds were found to form without control and to degrade during aromatization. Star copolymers containing conjugated PPP were characterized by size exclusion chromatography, UV, and fluorescence spectroscopy. Fluorescence quantum yields of C 60 (st−PPP−PS) 6 and C 60 (PS−PPP) 6 in THF were compared and discussed in light of characterizations of PPP−PS−PPP in comparable conditions without or mixed with C 60 (PS) 6 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mignard et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: