The novel benzyl-furoquinoline vasodilator CIJ-3-2F demonstrates antiarrhythmic properties in rat hearts by blocking multiple ion channels and modifying electromechanical function.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the antiarrhythmic efficacy and the underlying mechanisms of the benzyl-furoquinoline vasodilator, CIJ-3-2F, in rat cardiac preparations. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Conduction electrograms and left ventricular pressure were determined in Langendorff-perfused hearts. Action potentials were assessed with microelectrode techniques, calcium transients by fura-2 fluorescence and ionic currents by whole-cell patch-clamp techniques. KEY RESULTS: In isolated hearts, CIJ-3-2F prolonged sinus cycle length, QT interval, Wenckebach cycle length, atrio-His bundle and His bundle-ventricular conduction intervals, refractory periods in atrium, AV node, His-Purkinje system and ventricle, and also increased left ventricular pressure. CIJ-3-2F reduced the incidences of both ischaemic and reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias and prevented the induction of atrial tachyarrhythmias. In both atrial and papillary muscles, CIJ-3-2F decreased upstroke velocity and prolonged duration of the action potential. In ventricular myocytes, CIJ-3-2F moderately increased the amplitude of [Ca(2+)]i transients and cell shortening. CIJ-3-2F inhibited the transient outward K(+) current (Ito ) (IC₅₀ = 4.4 μM) with accelerated inactivation, a slower rate of recovery from inactivation and use-dependency. CIJ-3-2F also suppressed the steady-state outward K(+) current (Iss , IC₅₀ = 3.6 μM, maximum inhibition = 65.7%) and both the inward Na(+) current (INa , IC₅₀ = 2.8 μM) and L-type Ca(2+) current (ICa,L , IC₅₀ = 4.9 μM, maximum inhibition = 69.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: CIJ-3-2F blocked Na(+) and Ito channels and, to some extent, also blocked Ca(2+) and Iss channels, modifying cardiac electromechanical function. These effects are likely to underlie its antiarrhythmic properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: