Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims: to estimate the dietary energy contribution of ultra-processed foods and the association on nutritional dietary profile, nutritional status, chronic disease, and functional capacity of Brazilian elders. Methods: we performed an epidemiology cross-sectional study conducted with 332 participants (≥60 years old). Food consumption was measured by three 24-h food recall. Foods were classified according to NOVA classification as in natura/minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods. Anthropometric variables were used to assess nutritional status, and scales of activities of daily living to assess functional capacity. Chronic diseases were self-reported. Results: the average daily consumption of energy was 2433,96 kcal, being 10.44% from ultra-processed foods. Elders with higher ultra-processed foods intake showed higher consumption of energy, added sugar, total and saturated fat, and fewer consumption of proteins, fibres, potassium, magnesium, iron, zinc, copper, selenium, B6 vitamin e folate. Most participants were independent for functional capacity, overweight, and very high risk for cardiovascular disease, but no statistical significance was observed. No association was found between ultra-processed foods and nutritional dietary profile, nutritional status, chronic disease, and functional capacity. Conclusions: elders who had the highest ultra-processed foods consumption had lower diet quality, although no influences on nutritional status and health variables assessed were observed in this sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: