It is the odd fate of cinematic representation to be at once infinitely more fragile than its theatrical counterpart and infinitely more robust. Film occurs in a kind of virtual space. Lacking a dimension lacks a basic presence in the world we live in. Nothing in a film can touch or be touched. It is pure apparition, insubstantial but unchangeable, like the ghost of Hamlet's father. Touching this vision here, / It is an ghost, that let me tell you (I. v. 143-144), says Hamlet, but all he is saying is that the ghost resists reference (touching), since will transpire that honest only means that really is a ghost. Film is pure apparition, but this also implies that nothing from this world can affect what happens in the space of film: it is as the air, invulnerable (I. 1. 150). That space can be destroyed, but cannot be entered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Flesch (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: