For angiography using synchrotron radiation we measured the absorbed dose distribution in inhomogeneous phantoms with thin LiF:Mg, Cu, P, LiF:Mg, Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in tissue and lung substitutes, and with Mg2SiO4:Tb TLDs in bone substitute for 33.32 keV monoenergetic photons from synchrotron radiation. The energy responses of the TLDs were measured in air for 10-40 keV monoenergetic photons. The values at 30 keV became smaller by 30% for LiF:Mg, Cu, P and larger by 22% for Mg2SiO4:Tb than the ratio of the mass energy absorption coefficients of the TLDs to that of air. These values were used to modify the calculated response of the TLDs in each phantom material. The absorbed dose distribution obtained was compared with that calculated using the Monte Carlo transport code EGS4 expanded to a low-energy region, and their agreement was confirmed taking linear polarization into account. In the bone substitute the dose increased by a factor of 3.9, while behind the bone the dose decreased drastically because of photon attenuation. In the lung substitute a slight dose difference from that in soft tissue was observed because of its different density. The LiF:Mg, Cu, P TLDs exhibited a better energy response, higher sensitivity and wider linear regions than did the other tissue-equivalent TLDs in the low-energy region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nariyama et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: