Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electron propagator calculations have been performed on linear carbon cluster dianions from C2−7 to C2−10 and on branched C2−7, C2−9, and C2−11 structures which have a central, tricoordinate carbon bound to three branches with alternating long and short bonds. The more stable, branched isomer of C2−7 has a positive vertical ionization energy, but the linear form does not. While linear C2−10 is stable with respect to electron loss, it is not possible to decide from these calculations whether linear C2−8 and C2−9 have the same property. There is evidence that better calculations would obtain bound C2−8 and C2−9 species. Vertical ionization energies of all branched dianions are positive. Feynman–Dyson amplitudes for dianion ionization energies display delocalized π bonding, with the two terminal carbons of the longest branches making the largest contributions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zakrzewski et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: