Why the study?
The study was conducted to develop an affordable and remote intelligent respiratory monitoring system for measuring respiratory signals at low cost.
A low-cost, camera-based remote respiratory monitoring system demonstrated good accuracy for estimating respiratory rate and classifying breathing patterns.
Supports feasibility of camera-based remote respiratory monitoring; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
The aim of this study is to develop an affordable and remote intelligent respiratory monitoring system. To achieve low-cost and remote measurement of respiratory signal, an RGB camera collaborated with marker tracking is used as a data acquisition sensor, and a Raspberry Pi is used as a data processing platform. To overcome challenges in actual applications, the signal processing algorithms are designed for removing sudden body movements and smoothing the raw signal. Subsequently, respiratory rate (RR) is estimated by a translational cross-point algorithm, and the respiratory pattern is identified by the recurrent neural network. For estimating RR, the translational cross-point algorithm performs better than other methods with root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 3.29 bpm. With respect to the classification of breathing patterns, the established neural network performs better than support vector machine-based classifiers with the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 of 89.0%, 89.0%, 90.5%, and 89.0%, respectively. The obtained decision-making information and some original information are sent to the user’s smartphone via a cloud service platform. In a way, due to its low-price, noncontact, and portable merits, the established system can be seen as a “respiratory consultant” by your side.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: