Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The solvolyses of spiro[2,4]hept-4-yl, spiro[2,5]oct-4-yl,2-methylenecyclopentyl, 2-methylenecyclohexyl, 2,2-dimethylcyclopentyl, and 2,2-dimethylcyclohexyl 3,5-dinitrobenzoates have been examined in 60 wt% aqueous dioxane. The solvolysis rate of spiro[2,4]hept-4-yl 3,5-dinitrobenzoate was 850 times greater than that of the corresponding allyl derivative, the 2-methylenecyclopentyl ester, and 3.0×105 times greater than that of the 2,2-dimethylcyclopentyl ester. Similarly, in the cyclohexyl series, spiro[2,5]oct-4-yl 3,5-dinitrobenzoate solvolyzed 330 times faster than the 2-methylenecyclohexyl ester and 1.9×105 times faster than the 2,2-dimethylcyclohexyl ester. In a buffered solution, the spiro[2,4]heptyl ester gave a mixture of spiro[2,4]heptan-4-ol (46%), bicyclo[3,2,0]heptan-1-ol (28%), and 3-methylenecyclohexanol (10%), besides internally-returned 3,5-dinitrobenzoate of bicyclo[3,2,0]heptan-1-ol (12%). Under the same conditions, the spiro[2,5]oct-4-yl ester produced spiro[2,5]octan-4-ol (71%), bicyclo[4,2,0]octan-1-ol (21%), and 3,5-dinitrobenzoate of bicyclo[4,2,0]octan-1-ol (6%), the product of internal return. The implication of these results are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuji et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: