Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigated, using a controlled experimental design, the impact of an encounter group on psychological development and helping skills among 2nd-year undergraduate psychology students. Students in the training condition participated in three weekly 4-hour sessions of classical Rogerian encounter group while students in the control condition did not receive any intervention. Results showed a significant increase in self-actualization and emotional intelligence in the encounter group from pre- to post-test compared to the control condition. Only encounter group participants had learnt to decrease their use of not-client-centered responses (i.e. advice, judgments, and closed questions) to a simulated client. These promising findings are discussed in relation to more structured teaching methods usually preferred in university settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brison et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: