Why the study?
Thromboembolic risk scores used for AF patients do not include mitral annular calcification as a potential indicator of vascular disease.
Is the presence of mitral annular calcification associated with higher thromboembolic risk scores?
Is the presence of mitral annular calcification associated with higher thromboembolic risk scores?
Mitral annular calcification is associated with higher thromboembolic risk scores and vascular disease risk, suggesting its potential utility as an additional parameter in risk stratification models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MAC was associated with higher thromboembolic scores; hypothesis-generating for incremental value in risk models.
Thromboembolic (TE) risk scores used for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients do not include mitral annular calcification (MAC) as a potential indicator of vascular disease. This research evaluated the correlation between MAC and TE risk scores (CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc). We compared TE risk score values and clinical and echocardiographic data in patients with and without MAC. We included, prospectively, 103 patients: 40.8% with AF, 83.5% with hypertension, 30.1% with type II diabetes mellitus, 79.6% with chronic heart failure, and 7.8% with a history of stroke. We identified MAC in 50.5% of patients. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 2.56 ± 1.135 and 4.57 ± 1.61, respectively. In MAC patients, both scores tended to increase significantly compared with the control (2.88 ± 1.114 versus 2.24 ± 1.06, p = 0.005, and 5.21 ± 1.51 versus 3.92 ± 1.46, p < 0.001, respectively). The left ventricular ejection fraction negatively correlated with the presence of MAC (r = −0.254, p = 0.01). The presence of MAC was a risk factor for vascular disease (OR = 2.47, χ2 = 34.32, p < 0001). Conclusions: The presence of MAC is associated with greater TE risk scores and a higher risk of vascular disease. It appears that adding MAC as a vascular disease parameter to TE risk scores may have benefits for patients by improving their predictive value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morariu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: