Why the study?
EEG signals provide vital information to investigate neurological disorders, prompting the development of versatile deep learning methods for efficient classification of epilepsy and schizophrenia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proposed SASDL and RBATQ deep learning models provide highly accurate automated classification of epilepsy and schizophrenia from EEG signals.
The most vital information about the electrical activities of the brain can be obtained with the help of Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. It is quite a powerful tool to analyze the neural activities of the brain and various neurological disorders like epilepsy, schizophrenia, sleep related disorders, parkinson disease etc can be investigated well with the help of EEG signals. In this paper, two versatile deep learning methods are proposed for the efficient classification of epilepsy and schizophrenia from EEG datasets. The main advantage of using deep learning when compared to other machine learning algorithms is that it has the capability to accomplish feature engineering on its own. Swarm intelligence is also a highly useful technique to solve a wide range of real-world, complex, and non-linear problems. Therefore, taking advantage of these factors, the first method proposed is a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) with swarm based deep learning method and it is named as (SASDL) using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique and the second technique proposed is the Reinforcement Learning based on Bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (BiLSTM), Attention Mechanism, Tree LSTM and Q learning, and it is named as (RBATQ) technique. Both these two novel deep learning techniques are tested on epilepsy and schizophrenia EEG datasets and the results are analyzed comprehensively, and a good classification accuracy of more than 93% is obtained for all the datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prabhakar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: